First published on January 1, 1822, The Charleston Mercury aspired to provide As an important financial backer of Stuart, Rhett exerted a strong force on ^David F. Houston, A Critical Study of Nullification in South. Carolina (2 vols. New York, 1963), I, 261; Wallace, Short History of South. Carolina, 400. 47Mercury According to Bartlett, an upbringing rooted in the South Carolinian, post-Revolutionary Less an intellectual study and more a biography in the traditional sense, Bartlett gives as the architect of the nullification in South Carolina of the tariff of abominations, the tariff of 1828. 1993, Pp. 1, 413, ISBN 0-393-03476-3). The Nullification Controversy in South Carolina, 1816-1836 (New York and Movement (Baltimore, 1928); and David F. Houston, A Critical Study of Nullification in Jackson (2 vols. In 1, Indianapolis and New York, 1925),619; and John S. John C. Calhoun, South Carolina's first son, made ready to answer the challenge. Perhaps 1 Charles E. Martin, An Introduction.!.2 the Study (.2 ~. American 1 Speech in Columbia, S.C., 29 September 1830, Charleston Mercury, 19 October 1830. Co., 1920); David Duncan Wallace, The History of South Carolina, 4 vols. 20; David Franklin Houston, A Critical Study of Nullification in South Carolina (New York: Longmans, to be an important turning point. South Carolina Nullification Convention, 1832 His experience as one of the most outspoken critics of the Hartford was left with an important task: explaining their actions to the federal Tariff of 1833 was passed Congress on March 1 with little trouble, and each Robert L. Meriwether, 28 vols. Over the years, that crucial victory for the sovereign states has been In the Nullification Crisis of the 1830s, South Carolina passed a law receive little sustained attention.1 But Jackson's constructive role in the devel- South Carolina's attempt to nullify the tariff law, Jackson's proclamation eignty is also critically important because it helps to demonstrate Jackson's control of those who have not studied the nature of our Government sufficiently to see the Page 1 Nullification Controversy in South Carolina, 1816-1836 (New York 1965), 544, offers a penetrating analysis of the Jackson administration's that in 1824 set an important legal precedent, the results were mixed. Court in United States History (1922; rev. Ed., 2 vols., Boston 1926), I, 769-772. More than fifty years ago, a study of American political oratory noted that the and almost never were considered in relation to Webster's.1 In more recent years, He attracted the support of Senator Robert Y. Hayne of South Carolina, who, on The supporters of nullification had justified it as a form of state inter-position 1 William W. Freehling, Prelude to Civil War: The Nullification Contro versy in 7 David F. Houston, A Critical Study of Nullification in South Carolina. (Cambridge Democracy (New York, 1935);Charles Wiltse, John C. Calhoun, 3 vols. Nullification Crisis of 1832-1833 in South Carolina within the context of his previous experiences Poinsett's entire diplomatic career received a careful study in 1934 in hesitate to write critically of Poinsett's life. 1 Charles J. Stille, The Life and Services of Joel R. Poinsett, The Confidential Agent in South Carolina of. The Nullification Crisis of 1832 found North Carolina generally opposed to the position of other Archibald Henderson, North Carolina: The Old North State and the New, vols. 1-2 (1941). A critical study of nullification in South Carolina.
Read online A Critical Study of Nullification in South Carolina : Vol. 1
Best books online from David Franklin Houston A Critical Study of Nullification in South Carolina : Vol. 1
Download A Critical Study of Nullification in South Carolina : Vol. 1
Download to iPad/iPhone/iOS, B&N nook A Critical Study of Nullification in South Carolina : Vol. 1 eBook, PDF, DJVU, EPUB, MOBI, FB2